Advances
in technology and the growth of e-learning to provide educators and trainers
with unique opportunities to enhance learning and teaching in corporate,
government, healthcare, and higher education. This application serves as
a forum to facilitate the exchange of information on the current research,
development, and practice of e-learning in the sectors.
It
includes the research, development, and practice of e-learning related to the
following multi-dimensional topics and sub-topics.
E-learning comes in different configurations that dictate the depth
of a needs assessment. The simple e-learning implementations, such as those
following an application service provider (ASP) model, won't necessarily look
any different from a resource requirement perspective than traditional
classroom training. That's e-learning.
E-learning can be an enormous undertaking and, require significantly
more preparation due to its increased scope, higher interdependence, and
visibility. These factors--described below--are the reason a needs assessment
for an e-learning initiative looks different from one for a traditional
classroom program.
- Scope. Developing an e-learning initiative is a typically much larger endeavor than that of an instructor-led training (ILT) program. Consider the increased expenses, number of people involved, development time, technological requirements, and delivery options.
- Interdependence. It's possible, even common, for an ILT program to be conducted without the knowledge of anyone but the participants, their immediate managers, and the training provider. In contrast, even the smallest e-learning program requires a wider group of people. Ranging from (at a minimum) representatives from the IT and HR departments to (more commonly) an organization-wide task force, the scope of the project often dictates that there are more decision makers, more stakeholders, and more links between previously unrelated departments.
- Visibility. When a traditional training program goes bad, a participant's dissatisfaction is usually voiced by word of mouth. And the people who express dissatisfaction, in most cases, are the participants and, maybe later, the people directly affected by their work. Again, due to the scope of the undertaking (especially the high budget and number of resources required), the efficacy of an e-learning program will be delivered to a larger group of people and through a wider variety of channels than an ILT program. Typically, a CEO can tap into a training database and view participants' course comments, exam results, and the courses taken. It's easier to determine whether an e-learning program is unpopular or ineffective than to rely on word of mouth about a questionable ILT program.
Existing System
There is no online Education facility in many educational institutions
. Till now they used normal system of education . Because of this type of
education many people may suffer due to
distance problem and money problem. In this system it may take more time to
conduct exams and to give results.
Even the
Lectures also improve their skills in this competitive world. Their has no
enough time to upgrade their skills through the class room training. This is
the best solution that type of the people. The people who worked in the offices
they feel to update their qualification
that people could not go to the traditional training due to the time factors.
That people will update the skills through this site.
Proposed System
To overcome the problems in existing education system we are developing
this E-Learning system. With this system
people can learn from their own cities and villages easily. By using this
E-Learning system they can conduct exams
and give results in online within short period of time.
The people who much eager
to improved their skills, this site can give the better
knowledge for such type of people. The
Quality of the Education will give
through this site. Along with the administrator ,the people who have more
knowledge about the particular topic,that people also upload the content to the
site temporally. The Administrator
scrutinize the content then he will upload the content permanently. That means
the Quality of the education will got.
It is easy to say that more time and money will be savable to the user.
MODULES
§ Administration
§ User
Management
§ Content
Management
§ Evaluation
MODULE
DESCRIPTION
This
section attempts to describe each module of the project in brief, and the
detailed description of each of these modules is spread throughout this book.
Administration:
·
Uploading the content
permanently
This content uploaded by the Administrator
·
Uploading the content
temporally
·
Removing the content
permanently
·
Removing the content
temporally
·
Working options
o Caching
Feature
o Content
length for each Category
User
Management:
·
User Information
·
User Session
Maintenance
·
Updating User
Information
Content Management:
These are the pages that are associated with the logic pages, and
contain content specific to that page.
· Organizing the topics according to the category
·
Organizing the subtopics according to
the subcategory
·
Providing appropriate links to specified
category
Evaluation:
·
Preparing the question
paper randomly according to the category
·
Spot result evaluation
·
Specifying level of
evaluation
SOFTWARE
SPECIFICATION
OPERATING
SYSTEM : WINDOWS 2000
APPLICATION
TOOLS : Jdk 1.2,
Jsdk1.2 (Servlets)
: JSP(Java Server Page)
: ODBC
Drivers installed
: JDBC
Drivers installed
:
Fully Functional Html Editor
:Java Web Server 2.0
BACK END : ORACLE
8i Mircrosoft ODBC
For Oracle(ODBC Driver)
DOCUMENTATION : MS-WORD 2000
HARDWARE CONFIGURATION
SERVER MECHINE
RAM
: 128 MB
CACHE
:256KB
PROCESSOR :Pentium
III
HARD
DISK :20GB
CLIENT
MECHINE
RAM
:64MB
CACHE
:256KB
PROCESSOR :Pentium
III
HARD
DISK :20GB
PRINTER :Laser
Printer
No comments:
Post a Comment